Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]
How to understand that this camera cannot charge — it is not fake? - bug-code.com Q&A

How to understand that this camera cannot charge — it is not fake?

0 like 0 dislike
51 views
Example: www.avito.ru/moskva/fototehnika/canon_eos_5d_mark_ii_body_v_moskve_new_133636984

Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body for 38 dollars At the average for 45 to 50 Tr

What's the catch? Scam? :)
asked by | 51 views

6 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
A "broken" or "hot" pixel. Mileage about 10,000+, removed "run", vosstanovlena firmware (after a failed firmware or use Magic Lantern), illumination of a matrix of laser beams — "drawdown" of color, contrast one pixel at a time or all at the field, after hours functions — clean image sensor, shooting modes, broken shortcuts, non-working quick combination of buttons) and/or the recovered box (damaged blinds, mirrors), "broken" electronics, operation outside the permissible temperature (humidity, pressure), extreme shooting (shock, overload of more than 10g). All of this is that you when you buy will never be able to determine, of dismantling the apparatus or not by checking the brand service ON Canon or using proprietary software or tools on a portable laptop (Adobe CS, Adobe Bridge, DeadPixelTest). Here only the most General list. Full testing may require more than one hour, inspection camera, special. tools (mirror dentist, loupe, macro ring, white LED backlighting, etc.)
\r
I can tell you cant have, or not be. I took the "new" in the well-known brand. I slipped Mark II with a broken pixel and the mileage 10000.
\r
Tip — take a new in a sealed factory box and don't let anyone open it unless you know how to search for schools like the back-focus of the lens or light box.
answered by
0 like 0 dislike
Moral: if you need to sell broken shit — put the price above market and sluggish bargain.
answered by
0 like 0 dislike
Most likely is not a new and/or illegally obtained.
answered by
0 like 0 dislike
IMHO 1200--1300уе quite an adequate price for used carcass,
and 1600уе is only normal for the state of new that just delivered from the store and made a couple of shots.
Take a notebook, make a couple of frames, check for dead pixels and the actual mileage (in linux this can be done with gphoto2), the cosmetic inspection can be taken.
answered by
0 like 0 dislike
Imitation SLR does not exist. For detected just, to expensive. So if cheap, then it is either grey or need to sell quickly.
\r
Most likely grey. Anyway, when I 2 years ago bought 50D for the same ad, found a large number of sellers vparivayut SLR Canon the same pattern. The scheme is as follows:
— sold whale SLR 20% below the average price, slightly used, white with all documents (play, did not come; I realized that you need a higher class; it was too difficult)
— at the meeting it became clear that the whale glass there lies IS 18-55 (whale from 450D, cheapest glass Canon)
the meaning of all the machinations that gray DSLR bought cheap white glass and in garantiyku fit 50D kit
\r
In the case of 5D in the same way you would glass to completely throw out (or sell as used/no garantice), but the warranty card from the glass to invest in a box of gray 5D.
answered by
0 like 0 dislike
Just today people from Kaliningrad 5DmkII sold for 30 thousand. Of course, that the questions "what's the matter" he jokes.
\r
In any case, get a "gift" from the mail (if the device is really working) for 30 thousand do not want to. :)
answered by
Welcome to Bug-code Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.

24.8k questions

46.2k answers

0 comments

12.7k users

24,788 questions
46,220 answers
0 comments
12,704 users